The mainstream media has got a very large portion of the population duped into believing that humans have caused some sort of climate crisis (global warming) and that paying new emissions taxes will somehow fix all that is wrong with the world. This "crisis" is actually the greatest scam of all time and is based on bad science. It is a classic Problem / Reaction / Solution that is being used to line the pockets of fat cat "environmentalists" and further enslave humanity. In this article I will explain why the so called "climate crisis" is fallacy and nothing to worry about, who is behind it, and why you should refuse to pay a tax on living / breathing.
In the mainstream media it appears as though the "global warming" debate is over. We are facing a great problem, our carbon dioxide emissions have caused Earth's temperature to rise and if we don't do something to stop it right now we will face great cataclysmic events. The polar ice caps will melt, our ocean levels will rise and displace hundreds of millions of people, species will go extinct, and humanity will be brought to its knees. The truth is that what is presented to us as scientifically proven fact in the mainstream is still hotly contested by tens of thousands of the world's top scientists, and no real debate has even been done. Today you receive dumbfounded looks or worse if you even begin to question the validity of the idea that man made global warming exists and is caused by CO2 emissions. More likely you are ridiculed and possibly even considered to be suffering from a mental disorder when you present such a blasphemous question. Global warming has developed an almost religious, or cult-like following in the years since Al Gore's An Inconvenient Truth was produced and marketed through the mainstream media and was sent to schools as part of a new curriculum to indoctrinate our youth into the new religion of "climate change". Suddenly and without debate, a pseudo-scientific theory became fact almost over night. To this day Al Gore and his fellow fear-mongering "environmentalists" refuse any sort of debate on the subject and proclaim that it is just too urgent to waste time debating something so silly when what we need to do is focus on the solution. A solution which just happens to make Al Gore very rich. If global warming caused by man made carbon dioxide emissions is such a silly thing to debate, why don't they just do the debate and get it over with? Why won't Al Gore and other alarmists debate the issue? I suspect the reason they will not engage in the debate is because they are wrong, and debating it would prove them so. John Coleman, founder of the Weather Channel, along with over 30,000 other scientists are now trying to sue Al Gore for fraud. They feel that since the mainstream media will not cover both sides of the story, there is no other way to get the issue looked at seriously, so they are taking it to the courts.
It is evident that the climate on earth is indeed changing, but the climate on earth is always changing and humans have very little influence over it. A professor by the name of Nir Shaviv from the Institute of Physics at the University of Jerusalem discovered that there have been periods in earth's history where there was up to ten times as much carbon dioxide in the atmosphere as there is now, yet it had next to no impact on earth's temperature. Professer Ian Clark of the Department of Earth Sciences at the University of Ottowa is quoted saying "If we look at climate from the geological timeframe we would never suspect CO2 as a major climate driver. You can't say that CO2 will drive climate, it certainly never did in the past. " Dr. Piers Corbyn, a weather forecaster who uses sunspots to predict weather patterns, said that CO2 does not explain any past weather patterns. Professor Patrick Michaels of the Department of Environmental Sciences at the University of Virginia has said that "anyone who goes around and says that carbon dioxide is responsible for most of the warming of the 20th century hasn't looked at the basic numbers". One main reason that some people believe CO2 causes warming is the results of ice core surveys that can measure earth temperatures over hundreds of thousands of years. In Al Gore's An Inconvenient Truth it is said that for 650,000 years the ice core surveys show correlation between CO2 and temperature. "When there is more carbon dioxide, the temperature gets warmer." While the ice core surveys certainly do show that CO2 and warming seem to go together, Al Gore and his team make an incorrect assumption when they state that it is the CO2 that causes the warming. Professor Ian Clark says that Al Gore's team got it backwards, and that the warming actually causes the CO2. The ice core samples show that the warming leads the CO2 by about 800 years which means it could not possibly be the CO2 causing the temperature to change. Clark says that carbon dioxide is a product of temperature, not the other way around, and that completely destroys the fundamentals of the theory behind "global warming".
If it's not CO2 that's behind climate change, then what is causing all this apparent warming (we are actually in a cooling period, more on that later) that is melting the polar ice caps and raising sea levels? I know this might sound crazy so I'm just going to throw this idea out there for you to chew on for a bit … Could it possibly be the sun? When Dr. Sami Solanki, director of the Max Planck Institute for Solar System Research in Germany analyzed sunspot cycles and compared them to temperatures on earth, he found it stunningly obvious that when there are more solar flares, also known as sunspots, the temperature goes up to reflect the increase in solar activity. It's not only more heat from the sun that causes warming, cosmic rays interacting with water vapor create clouds which effect the temperature of earth. When there is strong solar radiation (more sunspots), fewer solar ray particles get through to the earth, resulting in fewer clouds. When there are fewer clouds, more solar heat is able to get through. When studying cosmic ray and temperature records going back up to six million years, you will find that when there is less solar radiation there are more cloud-forming cosmic rays, and temperatures go down. When solar radiation increases you will find that the temperature goes up, every single time. I have included a graph on my blog which shows the relationship between cosmic-rays and cloud cover, and another graph showing the relationship between sunspots and global temperature. Anyone with half a brain should be able to see that the sun is obviously the driving factor when it comes to the temperature on earth.
Often we are told that our planet is warmer now than ever before in recorded history. What they forget to mention is that "recorded history" means somewhere between 1860 and 1914. Our planet has been through many cycles, some lasting tens or hundreds of thousands of years, so are records from only 150 years ago really all that meaningful? Research by a study team at Harvard University showed that we have had much higher temperatures in the last thousand years, and we are not at an extreme at either end of the spectrum. Between the 9th and 14th centuries the temperatures were much warmer than today and in the 15th century there was the beginning of the "Little Ice Age" during which many rivers and waterways iced over and people had to adapt to the cooler temperatures. We are currently not even in a warm period when compared to the last 60 years or so we are actually in a cooling phase. Below is a graph which shows the current cooling trend. Recent news reports show that 2008 was the coldest year in the last century, with many countries reporting record amounts of snow in places that don't normally get any. You might find it funny to know that The International Organization for Global Warming had to postpone last years conference due to an unexpected blizzard and record breaking cold weather. These climate changes are natural, ever-present, and are nothing to be afraid of.
Even if carbon dioxide was causing warming of our earth, carbon taxes would not be a solution to the problem. Paying carbon taxes to fight carbon dioxide emissions would be about as effective as trying to fix a car that won't start by changing the rear wheel. Carbon taxes are a sick trick being played on the public by a group of greedy scam artists. Paying a tax makes the environment better? Since when? Even if that tax money went to pay people to plant trees or invest in renewable energy research and development (which it does) it would not likely make a noticeable or substantial difference to the betterment of our environment or our ability to sustain a non -changing climate. But since CO2 is not behind climate change at all, there is absolutely no reason that anybody should pay taxes on carbon emissions. If such carbon tax legislation ever does pass, I hope that everyone will stand together in protest of them and refuse to pay such ludicrous fees.
Many will accuse people who have done research into the global warming scam to be anti-environment, encouraging pollution, supporting big oil, or a plethora of other things. I personally have been accused of "enjoying toxic toxic air pollution and supporting the scourge of cancer" after speaking out about the truth behind the whole man made climate change scam. For some reason, which I suspect might be television and mainstream media mind programming, people make a connection that links people who are skeptical of man made global warming ("climate change deniers") to encouraging pollution. To make this perfectly clear, there is no such connection. CO2 isn't causing temperature changes but that doesn't mean you should run your car more often or quit recycling. I am in full support of exploring new clean renewable energy sources and better waste management and disposal.